Hello all--Hopefully we have now had the
time to go thru the report.  I think a major issue to
address before distributing the report to the
experiments is to correct any disparity between STAR
and PHENIX.  (We also need to clean up other sections
and that will also happen today, but some theory issues
can be addressed later this week I think.)

On reading the Phenix and Star sections, they take
fairly different approaches, both being fine I think,
but the question is whether they can coexist.
Phenix is too long and has some physics plots that
should be removed.  However, the main difference is in
giving performance details.  I wonder whether we can
get some performance details on the emcal and jets
for STAR from the d-A work with one or more figures?

I think each should have a figure on the W upgrade.
Both should have schedule and estimated cost (no detail)
as has been placed in the executive summary (Phenix is
missing this).

What is the best way to get this done hopefully today?

I suggest that we work in this direction today and
distribute drafts as soon as possible (figures were
missing for your draft for STAR).

If it is useful, we can schedule a telephone meeting
for 1730 say or later.

There are I think smaller issues in the science section.
The W section needs to be completed to distribute (it
is quite good I think).  The transverse spin section
is very well written but is too long I think.  However,
we can address this later this week.  There are a bunch
of smaller additions and corrections that need to go
in, and that will be done today hopefully.  (I have a
very useful list from Hal.)

So, please send to me and the group any comments,
suggestions, corrections.  New (or completed) drafts as
soon as possible for Star, Phenix, W.

Tom Ludlam read thru the plan and likes very much the
theory introduction (and suggests that this should be
highlighted in the summary!).  He questions the
W upgrade schedule.  I will try to meet with Tom 
today to address his questions and concerns, and we 
will get back to everyone on that.  Obviously the
proposed schedule is a major issue.  (The science
perspective WAS highlighted in the original summary.)

				Gerry