Hello planners--These are my notes on Tom Ludlam's
suggestions.

1. include some of the science/world perspective in the
Executive summary--1 paragraph at most.  I will do that.

2. Tom was concerned that L and P targets might come
back to haunt us if we don't reach them.  He had not
noticed the 5 physics weeks per year band on Wolfram's
plot.  I think he is satisfied with our presentation.

3. He is concerned that all major players have not been
lined up for an overall upgrade plan, for example
proposals to NSF that are mentioned in the plan.  He is
concerned about where we will stand if one or more isn't
supported by NSF.  He recognizes that the spin planners
cannot fix this, nor give priorities.  We agreed that
we should change to language like "possibility of NSF
support being pursued".  I will do that.

He agrees that the approach of 2 scenarios--10 spin
physics weeks/year with completion of W upgrades to
match, and 5 weeks/year--is a good approach.

4. Tom wants us to include sentences on R&D support of
the Phenix vertex detector work, GEM, and anything else
that we mention that has been supported with DOE R&D
funds.  I will try to collect the information and get
sentences into the document (here I will need help).

				Gerry