Experimental Side:
What You Measure:
Counts in Luminosity Monitors for each Beam State Lij
Photon Angle
Photon Energy
Jet Angle
Jet Momentum
Proton Beam Polarization Pb
(Note - Pb may differ for different beams and/or beam states.)
Steps in the Process:
Step 0.
Design and Build the Experiment
Step 1.
For each event that passes cuts (i.e. good jet,
Step 2.
X1 and X2 are the initial-state Bjorken X's of the quark and
the gluon, but you don't know which is which.
Each event has a unique pair of Xa and Xb.
Divide the acceptance into an equal number of Xa, Xb bins.
For n divisions in X, one obtains
*(Probabilities of which X is which are known. Gluons likely at low X.)
Step 2. (Cont.)
Using this binning system, you count the number of events in
each bin of (Xa, Xb) for each combination of the four spin states of the beam
Note:
Possible sources of background might include events with multiple direct
photons or one direct photon and multiple jets. In any case, systematic
errors due to background subtraction enter in at this stage.
Step 3.
In each bin, divide Nij(Xa, Xb) by the product of the raw
counts in the luminosity monitors for the two beams:
Note that there is only one value of Lij for each beam, and that
all the Nij's of the various (Xa, Xb) bins are divided by a
common product of Lij values.
The above assumes that there is no transverse jitter in the
beam positions or changes in beam focusing due to switching between
beam spin states. Any such changes will affect the collision rate
in a way that can cause false asymmetries. This issue is a critical
one, as it is potentially a major source of systematic errors. For
more on this topic, stay tuned for Dave Underwood's talk on luminosity
monitoring at the RIKEN workshop next April.
Step 4.
Assuming Pb is the same for both spin states of both beams,
ALL(Xa, Xb) is given by
You calculate this quantity for each bin of (Xa, Xb).
Recall that knowledge of the jet angle was required for calculating
Xa and Xb. Lacking this, you can try using single tracks in the acceptance
to estimate a jet angle, or some other way of estimating where the
jet went. Alternatively, you can simply calculate ALL as a function of PT,
which is obtainable from just the photon energy and angle. If you do this however,
you can't use ALL(PT) to extract a polarized gluon distribution function Phenomenological Side:
Step 5.
Warning: This step has not yet been worked out in detail, and what follows is
a description of a method which is still in the conceptual stage. The details of the
formulas used here may be wrong in some respects, but they will serve for now to illustrate
how it will be possible to obtain Step 5. (Cont.)
In using the binning scheme already described, we have added the contributions
from both of the two choices of assigning Xa and Xb to the quark and the gluon.
To disentangle this, we need to reflect this in the formalism. For the moment, suppose
that in addition to having measured ALL(Xa, Xb) with a polarized beam, we also
measured the unpolarized (spin-average) absolute differential cross section for direct
photon + jet production using unpolarized proton beams. In this case, the measured cross
section would be given by
where the terms on the right-hand side are true theoretical cross sections where you
know which X is which.
Step 5. (Cont.)
Now consider the product of ALL(Xa, Xb) with
which written more explicitly is something like
The pieces in the above will be described shortly, but in principle
everything is known except for Step 5. (Cont.)
In the previous equation, the pieces are:
(Note: It is known that Step 5. (Cont.)
The angles
where
where (See section 4.1 of C. Bourrely et. al., Phys. Rep. 177, 319 (1989) for more information.
Also listed there are various expressions for tree-level cross sections and asymmetries.)
Step 6. (If desired)
Once you have values of
which is half the fraction of the proton spin carried by gluons. The formula
for the proton spin is
where
where
from Direct Photon + Jet Measurements
Chris Allgower1
High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL
60439
Talk for RHIC Spin Discussion Group, March 17 1998
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
of the Proton Beams
above threshold,
coplanarity of jet and photon, etc., etc., etc.) calculate



So, define Xa and Xb to be


bins in (Xa, Xb):
. After subtracting backgrounds, you obtain
the raw counts for direct photon + jet events:


![\begin{displaymath}
A_{LL}(X_a, X_b) = \frac{1}{(P_b)^{\, \scriptscriptstyle 2}}...
...{-+}}
{n_{++}\; +\; n_{--}\; +\; n_{+-}\; +\; n_{-+}} \right].\end{displaymath}](img20.gif)
![]()
.
.

:
and
. If you binned Xa and
Xb into n bins each, then you can form an overdetermined system of
equations in the n
unknowns
.
Spin-average parton distribution functions obtained from
fits to data of unpolarized deep inelastic scattering experiments and others
such as jet-jet, Drell-Yan.
Polarized quark distribution functions obtained from fits to data of
polarized deep inelastic scattering experiments. (EMC, SLAC, HERA, etc.)
Tree-level spin-average Born cross section for direct photon + jet production,
which is a function of
only, and is calculable from PQCD.
This will be a combination of terms from both
and
processes. Presumably they are also flavor-dependent.
Tree-level Born asymmetry for direct photon + jet production,
which is a function of
only, and is calculable from PQCD.
This would also be a flavor-dependent combination of terms from both
and
.
tends to dominate at most angles.)
and
are given by


is given by

is the
of the jet.
![]()
, do a fit to the points and
calculate


is the quantity known from the EMC/NMC experiments:

![\begin{displaymath}
{\Delta}q = \int_{0}^{1} \left[ {\Delta}q(x) + {\Delta}\overline{q}(x) \right]dx.\end{displaymath}](img47.gif)
is the fraction of
the proton spin carried by things other than quarks and gluons. (i.e. Lz, sea quarks, etc.)